语言学论丛-第三十九辑

本书特色

有鉴于美国麻省理工学院(mit)乔姆斯基教授在世界科学界，特别是语言学界的崇高地位和广泛影响，经北京大学中文系和北京大学汉语语言学研究中心申请和教育部批准，北京大学*近正式决定授予乔姆斯基教授名誉博士学位，并已邀请乔姆斯基教授到中国和北京大学访问。本辑《语言学论丛》(第三十九辑)就是为庆祝乔姆斯基教授获授北京大学名誉博士学位而组编的专辑。

内容简介

本辑《语言学论丛》收录了25位学者撰写的19篇论文。其中包括乔姆斯基教授本人提交给2008年6月在北京大学召开的国际中国语言学学会第16次学术年会(iacl-16)并同意由《论丛》正式发表的论文。世界著名生成语法学家、美国石溪大学拉尔森教授和美国哈佛大学黄正德教授，都为本辑《语言学论丛》撰写了论文。专辑的其他论文作者也都是全世界范围内从事生成语法汉语研究方面*有影响的学者，他们中绝大多数都来自欧美和港台高等院校，其中有多位曾直接受业于乔姆斯基教授并在美国麻省理工学院获得博士学位，论文作者中仅有的两位中国国内学者也都曾在美国哈佛大学和麻省理工学院访问学习过。此外本辑《语言学论丛》的几乎所有作者，都曾先后被聘为北京大学汉语语言学研究中心专兼职研究员，也都曾访问过北京大学，与北京大学有长期和密切的学术联系。这些特点都使得本专辑不但集中反映了世界范围内生成语法汉语研究的一些*新成果，也充分体现了北京大学中文系和北京大学汉语语言学研究中心在汉语生成语法研究方面做出的努力和贡献。

节选

相关资料

插图：Acknowledgement The authOrs would like to thank Muffy Siegel，who read an earlier draft of this article and offered many valuable comments and suggestions，and Lu Bingfu，who discussed sOme of the issues with us.we w。uld alsO like to thank the audience at IAcL-16 held in Beijing，2008，particularly Gu Yang，C-T.JameHuang，Jo-wang Lin，Liu Chensheng，and Lu Jianming.Needless tO say，all errors remain our responsibility NotesIn many but not all non-root clause context，SAs are fine.Huang and Li（2008）made a distinction between root clauses and some non-root clauses;this issue wnl be discussed in more detail in Section 5.The distributional patterns with CAs are more complex than this.in- terested readers can refer to Huang（2006） for more specific discussions on subgroups 0f the complex adjectives，particularly with regard to the use of the so-caned predicate marker de 2 on some of them. Regarding clausal types, Huang（2006）only considers the predicate position of a root clause as the locus fOr this distributional pattern of SAs and CAs. See Sections 3.1 below for a discussion of small clauses in Huang（2006）and Huang and Li（2008）（cf·Gu （2008））.In Huang and Li（2008）we considered a few other clausal types' such as conditionals，and also found SA in predicate positions in those clause tvpes.This issue will be discussed in Section 5，where we show that there arestill questions to be answered.Huang（2006）points out that this constraint follows naturally from the coniunction analysis of modification as well as the Chierchian propertY theory. FOr ease of exposition， it is more convenient to refer tO type matching, a practice we will follow in this article. For further discussion of the literature on this point，see Zhu（1993）， Huang（2006，2008）and references cited therein.Note that being 0f the same type is a necessary but not snmcient condition for modification