×
汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究

包邮汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究

1星价 ¥41.3 (8.6折)
2星价¥41.3 定价¥48.0
暂无评论
图文详情
  • ISBN:9787030279286
  • 装帧:一般胶版纸
  • 册数:暂无
  • 重量:暂无
  • 开本:32开
  • 页数:337
  • 出版时间:2010-07-01
  • 条形码:9787030279286 ; 978-7-03-027928-6

本书特色

《汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究》:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(08JC740010)广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目(08YK-01)资金资助

内容简介

汉语名源动词可以从“构词—句法”的角度得到合理的分析,该分析选取的理论框架包括一条显性的句法操作和两种轻语类。前者是指动词补语并移,即动词中心语移位时,可能连带其补语中除指示语外的部分并移;该操作作为一种选择性的动词移位方式,在一定的允准条件下发生,得到广泛的经验支持。后者包括元动词和虚介词。元动词独立于核心功能语类口和助动词,和普通实义动词同属词汇语类V;虚介词是一种连接不及物动词与其后名词性成分的语类。根据Vendler(1967)的事态类型,汉语名源动词可分为状态类、成就类、完成类和活动类四种,每一类名源动词都通过动词补语并移这一显性句法操作而生成,该操作涉及一个或一个以上处于动词中心语位置V的元动词和动词短语VP的补语位置上以一个虚介词为中心语和源名词为补语的介词短语PP。四类名源动词的推导所涉及的元动词的种类和数量有所不同,但推导所依赖的句法结构和句法操作是一样的。基于轻语类的动词补语并移对汉语中的名词动词化现象提供了简洁、统一和系统的解释。汉语名源动词的句法推导为以下相关现象提供了解释:①状态/成就类名源动词与完成/活动类名源动词在数量上的不对称以及名词和形容词在动词化方面的语类不对称;②名源动词的体态变化的模式;③完成类动词在汉语中的存在;④元动词对名源动词体态的决定作用;⑤名源动词的事态结构的合成性;⑥名源动词的语义生成。现代汉语和英语在名源动词方面存在三项差异:数量上不对称(即现代汉语中的名源动词比英语少许多);类型上不对称(即英语中一些类型的名源动词在现代汉语中不存在);体态上的不对称(即现代汉语中名源动词的体态特征与源名词的语义特征没有关联,而英语中名源动词的体态特征与源名词的语义特征有关联)。这些不对称现象归因于虚介词P、元动词和动词补语并移的参数变化。三个参数赋值的综合决定了现代汉语名源动词和英语名源动词之间的差异:前者的生成受句法制约;后者不受句法制约,仅遵循一形态规则N—V。正是这一差异造成了现代汉语和英语的名源动词之间的三种不对称现象。古代汉语中的名源动词在数量和类型上接近英语,而在体态方面则接近现代汉语。尽管虚介词P、元动词和动词补语并移在古代汉语句法中的表现与在现代汉语中没有明显的区别,基于轻语类的动词补语并移仅适合于现代汉语名源动词的推导,而不适合古代汉语名源动词的推导。为消解这一悖论,本书提出一种体现*简句法精神的解释。根据该解释,汉语允许由句法特征、语义特征和零语音特征组成的语素或语类,即轻语类,如元动词和虚介词;而英语则不允许这种语类。轻语类在古代汉语中属于强语类,仅局限于“构句—句法”操作;但在现代汉语中它们属于次强语类,既接受“构句—句法”操作,又接受“构词一句法”操作。这两种参数变化合起来就可以整齐地解释现代汉语、古代汉语和英语在名源动词方面存在的对称和不对称现象。

目录

序 Acknowledgements Abstract 摘要 Glossary Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Denominal Verbs in Chinese 1.2.1 The Criteria 1.2.2 The Data 1.2.3 Semantic Properties of DNVs 1.3 Previous Approaches to DNVs 1.3.1 The Lexical/Morphological Approach 1.3.2 The Pragmatic Approach 1.3.3 The Lexical-semantic Approach 1.3.4 The Syntactic Approach 1.3.5 Summary 1.4 Rationale for This Research and Questions to Be Addressed 1.5 A Syntactic Approach to Chinese DNVs: An Overview Chapter 2 The V-bar Pied-piping Hypothesis 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The V-bar Pied-piping Hypothesis 2.2.1 Dative Shift Under Current Theories on Verb-related Movement 2.2.2 The V' Reanalysis Hypothesis 2.2.3 The V-bar Pied-piping Hypothesis 2.2.4 Licensing V-bar Pied-piping 2.3 Explaining Some (A)symmetries of Syntactic Domains 2.4 Explaining Some Natural Word Order Phenomena 2.4.1 Adjuncts 2.4.2 Verb Particles 2.4.3 Extraposition 2.4.4 Inversion 2.5 Deriving Compound Verbs in Chinese 2.5.1 Verb-Directional/-Phase Constructions in Chinese 2.5.2 Verb-Resultative Constructions in Chinese 2.5.3 Light Verb Constructions in Chinese 2.6 Summary Chapter 3 Semantic Light Categories in Chinese 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Light Verbs: Syntactic vs. Semantic 3.2.1 The Meanings of Light Verb 3.2.2 Light Verb v vs. Proto-verbs 3.2.3 Proto-verbs vs. Canonical Verbs 3.2.4 Auxiliary Verbs 3.3 Null Prepositions in Chinese 3.3.1 Variety and Unselectiveness of Verbal Objects 3.3.2 The Null Preposition Hypothesis 3.3.3 Some Consequences 3.4 Summary Chapter 4 Syntactic Derivation of DNVs 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Reclassifying DNVs in Chinese 4.2.1 Aspectual Classes of Verbs 4.2.2 Aspectual Classes of Chinese DNVs 4.3 Deriving DNVs via Syntax 4.3.1 Deriving Sta-DNVs 4.3.2 Deriving Ach-DNVs 4.3.3 Deriving Acc-DNVs 4.3.4 Deriving Act-DNVs 4.4 Summary Chapter 5 Syntax-Induced Properties of DNVs 5.1 Introduction 5.2 The Inter-Class Quantitative Asymmetry 5.3 The Inter-Categorical Asymmetry 5.4 The Pattern of Aspectual Shift with DNVs 5.4.1 State-to-Achievement Shift 5.4.2 Achievement-to-Accomplishment Shift 5.4.3 Accomplishment-to-Achievement Shift 5.4.4 Achievement-to-State Shift 5.4.5 Some Caveats 5.5 Accomplishment Verbs in Chinese 5.5.1 The Traditional View 5.5.2 Object-coerced Accomplishment Verbs 5.5.3 Syntactically-derived Accomplishment Verbs 5.6 Determination of the Aktionsart of DNVs 5.6.1 Definiteness of Objects 5.6.2 Boundedness of Objects 5.6.3 Boundedness of Source Nouns 5.6.4 Proto-verbs 5.7 Eventuality Structure of DNVs 5.7.1 The Singular-headedness of Sta- and Act-DNVs 5.7.2 The Double-headedness of Ach-DNVs 5.7.3 The Triple-headedness of Acc-DNVs 5.8 Semantic Generation of DNVs 5.8.1 The Basics of Generative Lexicon 5.8.2 Generating the Semantics of Sta-DNVs 5.8.3 Generating the Semantics of Ach-DNVs 5.8.4 Generating the Semantics of Acc-DNVs 5.8.5 Generating the Semantics of Act-DNVs 5.8.6 Functioning of Proto-verbs 5.9 Summary Chapter 6 A Comparative Perspective on DNVs 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Asymmetries Between Chinese and English DNVs 6.2.1 Quantitative Asymmetry 6.2.2 Typological Asymmetry 6.2.3 Aspectual Asymmetry 6.3 Potential Parametric Variations 6.3.1 Activity vs. Inertness of Null Preposition P 6.3.2 Prominence vs. Dormancy of Proto-verbs 6.3.3 Applicability of V-bar Pied-piping 6.4 The Account for the Asymmetries 6.4.1 Explaining the Quantitative Asymmetry 6.4.2 Explaining the Typological Asymmetry 6.4.3 Explaining the Aspectual Asymmetry 6.5 Summary Chapter 7 A Diachronic Perspective on Chinese DNVs 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Characteristics of Classical Chinese DNVs 7.3 Light Categories and V-bar Pied-piping in Classical Chinese 7.3.1 Null Prepositions in Classical Chinese Syntax 7.3.2 Proto-verbs in Classical Chinese Syntax 7.3.3 V-bar Pied-piping in Classical Chinese Syntax 7.3.4 Classical Chinese DNVs: A Paradox 7.4 A Minimalist Account 7.4.1 Patterns of Feature Bundling 7.4.2 Strength of Morphemes 7.4.3 The Account 7.5 The Extension of Light Categories from Syntax to Morphology 7.5.1 The Denominal Prefix *s- in Early Archaic Chinese 7.5.2 The Denominal Falling Tone in Middle Archaic Chinese 7.5.3 Denominal Light Categories in Modem Chinese 7.6 Summary Chapter 8 Concluding Remarks 8.1 Major Findings 8.2 Limitations Appendix References
展开全部

节选

《汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究》内容简介:Chinese denominal verbs (DNVs for short) are amenable to an L-syntactic analysis, which is accommodated in a theoretical framework that comprises an overt syntactic operation and two light syntactic categories. The former is V-bar pied-piping, i.e. the head V, when it raises, may optionally pied-pipe its Complement, but stranding the Specifier of its Complement. The operation works as an alternative to the standard way for verb movement under certain licensing conditions and enjoys extensive empirical support. The latter includes proto-verbs,which we separate from categories such as the CFC v and auxiliary verbs, and null prepositions, which, in our argument, may mediate between an intransitive verb and a nominal phrase following it.

相关资料

插图:Hale & Keyser (1993, 1997, 1999) adopt the position that universalgrammar plays a role in specifying the principles that constrain theconstruction of word meanings though it does not specify wordmeanings themselves. So word meanings arise from the interaction oflinguistic predispositions with empirical experience. Basing their ar-gument mainly on an analysis of the semantic structure of DNVs(such as unergative verbs calve, dance, sing, etc. and "put" verbs suchas shelve, corral, saddle, coat, etc.) and of deadjectival verbs (such asclear, widen, etc.), Hale & Keyser take the semantic construction ofthese verbs to be completely governed by syntactic principles. A verbhas a Lexical Relational Structure (shortened as LRS hereafter), withinwhich the verb's relation to other constituents is fully determined. TheLSR itself follows from syntactic principles such as Kayne's (1984)Unambiguous Paths, Larson's (1988) Single Complement Hypothesisand Chomsky's (1986) Full Interpretation. "There is no 'thematic roleassignment', apart from predication; and there are no 'thematic roles',apart from the lexical relations expressed in unambiguous, fully in-terpreted projections of elementary lexical categories" (Hale & Keyser1993: 93-4). The formation of DNVs results from syntactic operationsthat observe the same syntactic principles as basic or underived verbsdo in undergoing syntactic operations. Any violation of syntacticprinciples, e.g. Head Movement Constraint (shortened as HMC here-after), Empty Category Principle (shortened as ECP hereafter), etc.,would give rise to "impossible words".

预估到手价 ×

预估到手价是按参与促销活动、以最优惠的购买方案计算出的价格(不含优惠券部分),仅供参考,未必等同于实际到手价。

确定
快速
导航