中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集

目录 序 言加强国际司法交流与合作 共创知识产权保护事业的美好未来…… 中华人民共和国二级大法官、**副院长 陶凯元 1*章 商标案件姓名权可以构成商标法保护的“在先权利”——迈克尔·杰弗里·乔丹与商标评审委员会、乔丹体育股份有限公司商标争议行政系列纠纷案 …………………………………3商标国际注册申请人应当获得合理的补正机会——克里斯蒂昂迪奥尔香料公司与商标评审委员会商标申请驳回复审行政纠纷案 ……………………………………………………25恶意取得并行使商标权的行为不受法律保护——王碎永与深圳歌力思服装实业有限公司等侵害商标权纠纷案…………………………………………………………………………37楼盘名称与注册商标权的保护及擅自使用他人企业名称的判断——广州星河湾实业发展有限公司、广州宏富房地产有限公司与江苏炜赋集团建设开发有限公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案…… 48中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 1 2018/10/10 14:43:412The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in China中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集 判断中外文商标是否构成近似应当考虑二者是否已经形成了稳定的对应关系——拉菲罗斯柴尔德酒庄与商标评审委员会、南京金色希望酒业有限公司商标争议行政纠纷案 ………………………………… 60商标法关于“其他不正当手段取得注册”的认定——李隆丰与商标评审委员会、三亚市海棠湾管理委员会商标争议行政纠纷案 …………………………………………………… 69电视节目名称在商标法意义上的使用与侵权判断——金阿欢与江苏省广播电视总台、深圳市珍爱网信息技术有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案 ………………………………………… 78商品名称作为未注册*保护的司法标准——“新华字典”侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案 ………… 94第二章 专利案件药品制备方法专利侵权纠纷中被诉侵权药品制备工艺的查明——礼来公司与常州华生制药有限公司侵害发明专利权纠纷案……………………………………………………………………115设计特征的认定及对外观设计近似性判断的影响——浙江健龙卫浴有限公司与高仪股份公司侵害外观设计专利权纠纷案 ……………………………………………………………147马库什权利要求的性质、在无效程序中的修改方式和创造性判断方法——专利复审委员会与北京万生药业有限责任公司、*三共株式会社发明专利权无效行政纠纷案 ……………………………156产品说明书是否属于专利法意义上的公开出版物——蒂森克虏伯机场系统（中山）有限公司与中国国际海运集装中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 2 2018/10/10 14:43:413 Contents 目录 箱（集团）股份有限公司、深圳中集天达空港设备有限公司、广州市白云国际机场股份有限公司侵害发明专利权纠纷案………170专利权人与侵权人的事先约定可以作为确定专利侵权损害赔偿数额的依据——中山市隆成日用制品有限公司与湖北童霸儿童用品有限公司侵害实用新型专利权纠纷案 ……………………………………179被侵权人向网络服务提供者所发出的有效通知、网络服务提供者接到通知后所应采取的必要措施的判断方法——威海嘉易烤生活家电有限公司与永康市金仕德工贸有限公司、浙江天猫网络有限公司侵害发明专利权纠纷案 ………………190第三章 著作权案件根据同一历史题材创作作品中的必要场景和有限表达方式不受著作权法保护——张晓燕与雷献和、赵琪、山东爱书人音像图书有限公司著作权侵权纠纷案 ……………………………………………………211民间文学艺术衍生作品的表达系独立完成且有创作性的部分受著作权法保护——洪福远、邓春香与贵州五福坊食品有限公司、贵州今彩民族文化研发有限公司著作权侵权纠纷案 …………………………228书信手稿的性质，手稿拍卖与著作权侵权纠纷案件中的诉前行为保全——杨季康与中贸圣佳国际拍卖有限公司书信手稿拍卖诉前行为保全案 ……………………………………………………………248“云音乐”平台侵害信息网络传播权诉前行为保全的审查判断——深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司与广州网易计算机系统有限中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 3 2018/10/10 14:43:414The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in China中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集 公司、网易（杭州）网络有限公司、杭州网易雷火科技有限公司、中国联合网络通信有限公司湖北省分公司、广东欧珀移动通信有限公司侵害音乐作品信息网络传播权纠纷行为保全申请案……262行为保全的实体审查要件、网游侵权案件中难以弥补损害的认定、游戏整体下线及玩家利益的保护——暴雪娱乐有限公司等与成都七游科技有限公司等著作权侵权及不正当竞争纠纷诉中行为保全案 ……………………………279思想与表达的划分、涉文学作品侵害改编权的判定思路——陈喆（笔名 ：琼瑶）与余征（笔名 ：于正）等侵害著作权纠纷案 ……………………………………………………………295第四章 垄断、竞争案件知名商品特有包装装潢权益归属的确定——广药集团与加多宝公司等擅自使用知名商品特有包装装潢纠纷案 ……………………………………………………………313互联网领域相关市场界定及滥用市场支配地位行为的分析方法——奇虎公司与腾讯公司滥用市场支配地位纠纷案 …………324经营者占有市场支配地位的认定——吴小秦与陕西广电网络传媒（集团）股份有限公司捆绑交易纠纷案 ……………………………………………………………349互联网市场背景下对反不正当竞争法第二条规定的适用及技术创新、自由竞争和不正当竞争的界限——北京奇虎科技有限公司、奇智软件（北京）有限公司与腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司、深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司不正当竞争纠纷案 ………………………………………………………368中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 4 2018/10/10 14:43:415 Contents 目录 商业秘密侵权诉讼中行为保全措施的审查与适用——美国礼来公司、礼来（中国）研发公司诉黄孟炜侵害技术秘密纠纷案 ………………………………………………………379解决权利冲突的原则 ：保护在先权利与权利共存并重——北京趣拿信息技术有限公司与广州市去哪信息技术有限公司不正当竞争纠纷案 ………………………………………………393商业秘密中客户名单的认定，以及侵权人承担停止侵权民事责任的适用——鹤壁市反光材料有限公司与宋俊超、鹤壁睿明特科技有限公司、李建发侵害商业秘密纠纷案 ……………………………406第五章 植物新品种案件为确保新品种继续生产，判令持父本母本双方当事人相互授权许可——天津天隆种业科技有限公司与江苏徐农种业科技有限公司侵害植物新品种权纠纷案 ………………………………………425第六章 集成电路布图设计案件集成电路布图设计专有权的侵权判定——钜泉光电科技（上海）股份有限公司与深圳市锐能微科技有限公司、上海雅创电子零件有限公司侵害集成电路布图设计专有权纠纷案 ……………………………………………………443第七章 知识产权刑事案件销售记录刷信誉行为的辩解无以证实，不予采信——郭明升、郭明锋、孙淑标假冒注册商标案 ………………463中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 5 2018/10/10 14:43:416The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in China中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集CONTENTSPrefaceFostering International Judicial Exchanges and Cooperation for a Brighter Future of Intellectual Property Protection.....................Hon. Ms. TAO Kaiyuan, Justice, Vice-President of the SupremePeople's Court of the People's Republic of China 3Chapter 1Trademark CasesName Right Can Constitute “pre-existing right” Protected by Trademark Law——Michael Jeffrey Jordan v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and QIAODAN Sports Co., Ltd................................................ 13An Applicant for International Trademark Registration Should Have a Reasonable Chance to Make Supplements and Corrections——Christian Dior Perfumes LLC v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board................................................................................................... 30Malicious Acquisition and Exercise of Trademark Rights is not Protected by Law——Wang Suiyong v. Ellassay............................................................. 42Protection for Name of Real Estate Property and Right to Registered Trademark, and Judgment on Unauthorized Use of Another Enterprise's Name中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 6 2018/10/10 14:43:417 Contents 目录 ——Guangzhou Star River Industry Development Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Hongfu Real Estate Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Weifu Group Construction & Development Co., Ltd. ........................................................................ 53Judging Whether Two Trademarks in Chinese and Foreign Languages are Similar Requires Considering Whether the Two Constitute a Stable Correspondence——Chateau Lafite Rothschild v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and Nanjing Gold Hope Wine Industry.................................... 64Recognition of “Registration Obtained by Other Improper Means” Under the Trademark Law——Li Longfeng v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and Sanya Haitangwan Management Committee...................................... 73Judgment on Use and Infringement of TV Program Names from the Perspective of Trademark Law——Jin Ahuan v. Jiangsu Broadcasting Corporation and Shenzhen Zhenai.com Information Technology Co., Ltd. ................................... 85Judicial Protection Standard for Product Name Constitute of Unregistered Well-Known Trademark ——Commercial Press Co.,Ltd v. Sinolingua Co., Ltd. .................... 102Chapter 2Patent CasesIdentification of the Preparation Nethod of the Alleged Infringing Drug in Patent Infringement Dispute——Eli Lilly & Co. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. .................................................................................................... 129Judgment on Determination of Design Features and Their Influence on Design 中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 7 2018/10/10 14:43:418The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in China中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集 Similarity——Jianlong v. Grohe ....................................................................... 151The Nature of the Markush Claim, the Amendment to It in the Invalidation Proceeding and the Method for the Inventive Step Judgment——Patent Reexamination Board v. Beijing Winsunny Harmony Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co.,Ltd. ............................ 162Whether or Not Product Manuals Are Considered as Publications as Defined in the Patent Law ——ThyssenKrupp Airport Systems (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. v. China International Marine Containers (Group) Ltd., Shenzhen CIMC Tianda Airport Equipment Co., Ltd., and Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Co., Ltd. ............................................................................... 174Prior Agreements Between the Patentee and Infringer Can Be the Basis to Determine the Damages of Patent Infringement ——Zhongshan Longcheng Daily Use Products Co., Ltd.v. Hubei Tongba Children Ltd. ....................................................................... 184Judging Whether the Notice Sent by the Victim of the Tort to the Network Service Provider Is Effective and Whether the Network Service Provider Has Taken Necessary Measures Upon Receipt of Such Notice——Weihai Jiayikao Home Appliances Co., Ltd. v. Yongkang Jinshide Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd. ........................................................................................... 198Chapter 3Copyright CasesThe Copyright Law Does Not Protect Necessary Scenes and Limited Expression Forms in Original Works Created on Basis of the Same 中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 8 2018/10/10 14:43:419 Contents 目录 Historical Theme——Zhang Xiaoyan v. Lei Xianhe, Zhao Qi and Shandong Book Lover Audio-Video and Book Co., Ltd. ....................................................... 218Expressions Independently Created and with Originality in a Derivative Folk Literary and Artistic Work Shall Be Protected by the Copyright Law——Hong Fuyuan and Deng Chunxiang v. Guizhou Wufufang Food Co., Ltd. and Guizhou Jincai Natural Culture Research & Development Co., Ltd. ............................................................................................ 236Nature of Letters and Manuscripts, Manuscript Auction and Preliminary Injunction for Copyright——Yang Jikang v. Sungari International Auction Co., Ltd. ........... 254Review and Judgment of Preliminary Injunction against “Cloud Music” Platform's Infringement of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information——Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou NetEase Computer Systems Co., Ltd., NetEase (Hangzhou) Network Co., Ltd., Hangzhou NetEase Leihuo Co., Ltd., China United Network Communications Limited Hubei Branch, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. ....................................................... 269Substantive Elements Reviewed for an Injunction, Affirmation of Irreparable Harm in Online Game Infringement Cases and Holistic Removal of a Game and Protection of Players' Interests——Blizzard Entertainment Inc. et al.v. Chengdu Qiyou Technology et al. .................................................................................................. 286Divide of Idea and Expression, and the Way to Judge Adaptation Right Infringement Concerning Literary Works——Chen Zhe (pen name: Chiung Yao) v. Yu Zheng (pen name: Yu Zheng) et al. ..................................................................................... 301中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 9 2018/10/10 14:43:4110The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in China中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集Chapter 4Monopoly and Competition CasesDetermination on the Ownership of Packaging and Decoration Specific to Famous Commodities——GPHL v. JDB Company et al. ................................................... 318Analysis Methods of Internet-Related Market Definition and Abuse of Dominant Market Position——Qihoo v. Tencent on Abuse of Dominant Market Position ......... 335Recognition of Operator's Dominant Market Position——Wu Xiaoqin v. Shaanxi Broadcast & TV Network Intermediary (Group) Co., Ltd. .............................................................................. 357Applicability of Article 2 of Law Against Unfair Competition and the Boundary Among Technological Innovation, Free Competition and Unfair Competition in the Context of Internet Market——Qihoo and QGOA v. Tencent Company and Tencent Computer Company ........................................................................................... 373Review and Application of Behavioral Preservation in Trade Secret Infringement Litigations——Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly (China) Research and Development Co., Ltd. v. Huang Mengwei.............................................................. 385The Principle for Resolving Conflict of Rights: Attach Equal Importance to Protection of Prior Rights and Coexistence of Rights——Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. ........................................... 399Ascertainment of the Client List in Trade Secret and Application of Injunctive Order against Infringer——Hebi Reflective Material Co., Ltd. v. Song Junchao, Hebi Ruimingte Technology Co., Ltd., and Li Jianfa .................................................. 413中国知识产权司法保护经典案例集(2014-2018)-正式出版物.indd 10 2018/10/10 14:43:4111 Contents 目录Chapter 5New Plant Varieties CasesOrder the Parties Separately Holding the Male plant and the Female plant of a New Plant Variety to Cross License to Each Other to Ensure Continuous Production of the New Plant Variety——Tianjin Tianlong Seed Technology Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Xunong Seed Technology Co., Ltd. ................................................................ 431Chapter 6Integrated Circuit Layout Design CasesJudgment on Infringement on Exclusive Right of Integrated Circuit Layout Design——HiTrend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Renergy MicroTechnologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yachuang Texin Electronics Co., Ltd. ......................................................................... 451Chapter 7Criminal Cases of Intellectual Property RightDefending Statement of Faking Credibility through Unreal Sales Records Is Groundless and Unacceptable——Guo Mingsheng, Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao..................... 467