CTTI智库报告(2018)

2018CTTI来源智库发展报告 / 001 1中国特色新型智库建设进展 / 001 1.1智库政策文件制定点面俱到 / 001 1.2智库体系和平台建设日渐成熟 / 005 1.3智库交流与传播日益深化 / 009 1.4智库研究与评价长足发展 / 012 1.5小结 / 016 2“中国智库索引”CTTI系统概述 / 017 2.1CTTI系统开发与建设进展回顾 / 017 2.2CTTI数据收录情况概览 / 025 2.3CTTI的作用与影响 / 029 3 2018年度CTTI来源智库目录增补 / 032 3.1 CTTI来源智库增补原则 / 032 3.2 2018CTTI来源智库增补过程 / 034 3.3天津来源智库增补经验 / 036 3.4CTTI来源智库数据分析 / 037 4MRPAI测评指标体系与排序规则 / 042 4.1评价基本原则 / 042 4.2MRPAI测评指标的确定 / 043 4.3MRPAI智库测评指标的赋值 / 048 5 MRPAI排序规则 / 050 5.1MRPAI排序规则的设计原理 / 050 5.2MRPAI排序规则 / 051 5.3MRPAI智库专家排序规则 / 052 5.4大学智库指数排序规则 / 054 5.5MRPAI测评系统 / 055 6来源智库测评结果分析 / 056 6.1社会智库测评数据示例 / 056 6.2各研究领域智库测评数据示例 / 058 7加强中国特色新型智库建设的几点建议 / 074 7.1创新智库体制机制，完善智库治理 / 074 7.2改善智库服务模式，提供嵌入式服务 / 075 7.3优化智库人力资源布局，充实人才队伍 / 076 7.4增强国际交流合作，让世界理解中国 / 077 7.5树立智库品牌意识，打造旗舰产品 / 077 7.6促进智库协调发展，完善智库体系 / 078 附录：CTTI来源智库目录（2018—2019） / 080 2018 Annual Report on the Development of CTTI Source Think Tanks / 110 1Progress in the Construction of New Types of Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristics / 110 1.1Full Formulation for Think Tank Policies and Documents / 110 1.2The Think Tank System and Platform Becoming Mature / 118 1.3Deepening Communication and Dissemination of Think Tanks / 124 1.4Significant Progress in Think Tank Research and Evaluation / 131 1.5Conclusion / 138 2An Overview of the CTTI System / 139 2.1A Review of the Developing and Constructing Process of the CTTI System / 139 2.1.1Research and Development Background of the CTTI System / 139 2.2Overview of CTTI Data Inclusion / 150 2.3The Role and Impact of CTTI / 155 3Addition to Catalogue of CTTIs Source Think Tanks in 2018 / 161 3.1Principles of Source Think Tank Addition / 161 3.2The Process of Adding Source Think Tanks in 2018 / 164 3.3Tianjin Source Think Tanks Addition Experience / 166 3.4Analysis of the CTTI Source Think Tank Data / 168 4The MRPAI Assessment Indicator System and Ranking Rule / 174 4.1Basic Principles of Evaluation / 174 4.2Selection of the MRPAI Assessment Indicators / 175 4.3Value Assignment for MRPAI Indicators / 183 5The MRPAI Ranking Rules / 187 5.1Principle for Designing MRPAI Ranking Rules / 187 5.2MRPAI Ranking Rules / 188 5.3MRPAI Think Tank Expert Ranking Rules / 190 5.4University Think Tank Index Ranking Rules / 193 5.5MRPAI Assessment System / 194 6The Analysis of MRPAI Assessment Result Data / 195 6.1Examples of Evaluation Data on Private Think Tanks / 196 6.2Examples of Evaluation Data on Think Tanks in Various Research Areas / 199 7 Suggestions on Strengthening the Construction of New Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristic/ 225 7.1Innovating the System and Mechanism of Think Tanks and Improving the Governance of Think Tanks / 225 7.2Improving Think Tank Service Model and Providing Embedded Service / 227 7.3Optimizing the Distribution of Human Resources in Think Tanks and Enriching the Talent Team / 228 7.4Enhancing International Exchange and Cooperation to Make the World Understand China / 230 7.5Establishing Brand Awareness of Think Tanks and Building Flagship Products / 232 7.6Promoting the Coordinated Development and Improving the System of Think Tank / 233 Appendix: CTTI Source Think Tanks (20182019) / 235 2018 CTTI高校智库暨百强榜报告 / 274 1高校系统高度重视新型智库建设 / 274 2高校在新型智库建设中的独特作用 / 275 2.1学科齐全，便于开展跨学科的问题导向研究 / 275 2.2人才富集，有利于开展大规模数据工程 / 275 2.3高校智库有开展公共外交的便捷通道 / 276 2.4高校智库舆论公信力较高 / 276 2.5高校智库专业特征明显 / 276 3高校智库在新型智库体系中占据了重要地位 / 276 3.1高校智库的地域分布 / 277 3.2中国高校智库类型及研究领域分布 / 278 3.3高校智库的规模 / 278 3.4中国大学智库指数 / 278 4CTTI高校智库百强评价愿景与原则 / 281 4.1CTTI高校智库百强评价的界定 / 281 4.2CTTI高校智库百强评价的目的 / 282 4.3CTTI高校智库百强评价的原则 / 283 5CTTI高校智库百强评价体系及算法 / 286 5.1CTTI高校智库百强评价体系构建 / 286 5.2CTTI高校智库百强榜遴选过程 / 293 5.3CTTI高校智库百强榜名单 / 293 6CTTI高校智库百强榜数据分析 / 297 6.1CTTI百强高校智库地域分布 / 297 6.2CTTI百强高校智库大学分布 / 298 7高校新型智库建设中的主要问题 / 300 7.1缺乏明确的政策咨询信息，供求信息不对称 / 300 7.2传播意识淡薄，忽视宣传工作 / 300 7.3智库治理机制需要优化 / 300 8加强高校新型智库建设的几点建议 / 302 附录：CTTI高校智库百强机构小传 / 306 2018 Annual Report on CTTI University Think Tanks & Top 100 University Think Tanks / 351 1Great Importance Attached to the Construction of New Types of University Think Tanks / 351 2The Unique Role Played by Universities in the Construction of New Types of Think Tanks / 353 2.1Comprehensive Disciplines Make It Easier to Conduct Interdisciplinary ProblemOriented Researches / 353 2.2Abundant Talents Are Conducive to the Implementation of LargeScale Data Projects / 354 2.3University Think Tanks Provide an Easy Approach to Developing Public Diplomacy / 355 2.4University Think Tanks Have a High Level of Public Credibility / 355 2.5University Think Tanks Have Distinct Specialized Characteristics / 355 3The Important Role Played by University Think Tanks in the System of New Types of Think Tanks / 356 3.1Regional Distribution of University Think Tanks / 357 3.2Distribution of University Think Tanks in China by Type and by Area of Research / 358 3.3Scale of University Think Tanks / 359 3.4University Think Tank Index in China / 359 4Visions and Principles of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 363 4.1Definition of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 363 4.2Purpose of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 364 4.3Principles of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 366 5The CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation System and Algorithm / 370 5.1Establishment of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation System / 370 5.2Selection Process of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 380 5.3The CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 381 6Data Analysis of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 386 6.1Regional Distribution of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 386 6.2Distribution of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks in Colleges or Universities / 388 7Major Problems in the Construction of New Types of University Think Tanks / 390 7.1Lack of Clear Information on Policy Consultation and Imbalance between Information Supply and Demand / 390 7.2Weak Awareness of Communication and Publicity / 391 7.3Management Mechanisms of Think Tanks Required to Be Improved / 391 8Suggestions on How to Improve the Construction of New Types of University Think Tanks / 394 Appendix: Brief Biographies of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 400 2017“CTTI智库*佳实践奖”评选活动报告 / 474 前言 / 474 1智库*佳实践案例评选活动源起 / 474 1.1*佳实践 / 474 1.2智库*佳实践 / 476 1.3中国智库需要寻觅适合自身发展的“*佳实践” / 478 1.4智库*佳实践案例评选活动的意义 / 480 2 CTTI-BPA*佳实践案例评选回顾 / 481 2.1材料征集与审核 / 481 2.2评选过程回顾 / 481 2.3评选内容分析 / 482 2.4评选结果 / 487 2.5会议回顾 / 490 3 CTTI-BPA*佳实践案例撷英 / 493 3.1研究报告篇 / 493 3.2管理篇 / 496 3.3活动篇 / 497 结语 / 500 2017 Report on the Best Practice Awards for CTTI Think Tanks / 501 Preface / 501 1The Origin of Best Practice Awards for Think Tanks / 501 1.1Best Practice / 501 1.2Best Practice of Think Tanks / 504 1.3The Necessity of Chinese ThinkTank Development to Seek Best Practice / 507 1.4Significance of BPA Selection for Think Tanks / 511 2Process Review of CTTI-BPA Cases Selection / 512 2.1Material Collection and Review / 512 2.2Selection Process Review / 513 2.3Analysis of the Selection / 514 2.4Selection Results / 522 2.5Conference Review / 527 3Best Practice Examples of CTTIBPA / 532 3.1Research report / 532 3.2Management / 537 3.3Events / 540 Conclusion / 545